Marco Kammerer <marco.kammerer@???> (Mo 13 Nov 2006 21:02:31 CET):
> Hello,
>
> "Heiko Schlittermann" wrote on November 09, 2006 3:28 PM:
> >I set up one based on solely the senders ip address. It reduced the
> >mails i've to process by about 50%...
> >
> >I'm using a short shell script called from exims ACL via ${run{}}
> >
> >See http://www.schlittermann.de/doc/grey.html
>
> but it looks like that $spam_score_int is not available in
> acl_smtp_mail = acl_check_mail
... and as stated in some other mails: if this script is run in any acl
before the DATA acl you're out of luck. As well as you are if you use
sa-exim, because this extension modifies the mail instead of returning
you the spam results (it just returns success or failure).
But you may test, if the headers added by sa-exim are available.
.... hm. Thinking about this, I believe, sa-exim is called *after* all
the acl checks, isn't it?
Using the 'builtin' spam acl shouldn't change too much in your setup,
except that you're responsible for adding/modifying the headers and that
you'll loose the 'short spam report' as it can be added by sa-exim
method of processing.
Best regards from Dresden
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE -----------------------------------------
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B ---------------
gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B -
