Re: [exim] Blocking error on bad transport..?

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: W B Hacker
Date:  
To: exim users
Subject: Re: [exim] Blocking error on bad transport..?
Peter Bowyer wrote:

> On 26/09/06, Rob Munsch <rmunsch@???> wrote:


>
>>>>- -----
>>>>domain:
>>>> driver = domainlist
>>>> transport = remote_smtp
>>>> route_list = solutionsforprogress.com
>>>>dirtybill.solutionsforprogress.com philagrafika.org philagrafika.com byname
>>>>- -----
>>>
>>>'Someone' doesn't know the correct syntax for a route_list. The docs at
>>>
>>>http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.62/doc/html/spec_html/ch20.html
>>


Uh.. noo.. Wrong documentation.

If he is working with Exim 3.X, he will have a 'director'.

Aside from the obvious error in the 'route list' line (no separators) that looks
as if someone tried to use 4.X router syntax blended into a 3.X style 'director'?

All the more reason that upgrading will be less work, even in the short run.

3.X support on this list pretty well tailed off about 20 or 30 thousand messages
ago. No joke - I have local archives...

Bill