RE: [exim] Exim server behind NAT router (and HELO)

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MMGiuliano Gavazzi at <-
MMSteve Lamb at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: David Brodbeck
Date:  
To: Exim User's Mailing List
Subject: RE: [exim] Exim server behind NAT router (and HELO)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Giuliano Gavazzi [mailto:eximlists@humph.com]

> or maybe not? Isn't it possible to do Named Virtual Hosts with a
> CNAME? If that is true, then you do not need 1000s of A records and
> thus you do not need the corresponding PTRs.

It works for named virtual *web* hosts. However, having a CNAME precludes
you from having any other records for that name, so if you need an MX
record, you're out of luck.


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [exim] exim and iptablesRe: [exim] exim and iptables->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)