Re: [exim] 4.77: inlist condition

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M--+\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M-\MMTodd Lyons at <-
M\M.MAlways Learning at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: WJCarpenter
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] 4.77: inlist condition

>> I've been toying with the idea that Exim needs named parameterised
>> lookups. Notably, in 60 years of programming language development, this
>> idea has been stumbled upon before and has been given a catchy name.
>> "Functions".

If it turned out to be significantly easier to provide, I could get a
lot of mileage out of a beefed up macro facility ... one that did
parameter substitutions.


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-[exim] Blocking e-mail checking headersRe: [exim] 4.77: inlist condition->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)