On Sat, 13 May 2006, W B Hacker wrote:
>
> I think it would be a Very Good Idea to include not one, but
> several (three?) default / example submission authenticators,
Is there a third authentication mechanism that is as common as PLAIN and
LOGIN? Perhaps SPA if you are using Exim in a Windows environment, but I
would prefer to have a sample working config from someone who uses it for
real before I put it in the default config.
> at least one TLS-enabled over port 587.
My example plaintext authenticators require TLS. Port numbers are an
orthogonal issue, but I also included some comments about message
submission on alternate ports.
Do you have any specific suggestions for my proposed patch?
Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???>
http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
