Marc,
I like it and I dislike it. :-)
It is very fast, and learns very well. However, the primary
disadvantage is that it is a post SMTP session based solution. At least how
I have implemented it.
The other disadvantage is that each user is required to once in a
while go in and scan or review email which has been marked as spam (again,
as I have configured it).
Overall, I like it as the final layer of defense against spam which
the users have interaction with. All other layers/tools are at the system
level, and are controlled by the system admin.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: exim-users-bounces@??? [
mailto:exim-users-bounces@exim.org] On
Behalf Of Marc Perkel
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 9:32 PM
To: exim-users@???
Subject: [exim] Who likes DSPAM?
Just looking for a quick opinion - who likes DSPAM?
Been using spamassassin and spamprobe with it as a second bayesian
filter. The second filter is doing bayes on modified messages. I enhance
the headers and strip most of the body and feed the results back into SA
for scoring. Been working really well except I'm having problems with
spamprobe crashing and corrupting it's database.
And - I'm not using MySQL with SA and I like it - so - looking at DSPAM.
So - who likes/dislikes dspam and why?
--
Marc Perkel - marc@???
Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com
My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com
--
## List details at
http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
