Re: [exim] Heads up?

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M---\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M--\M++\Walt Reed at <-
M+\MMMMMAlun at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: David Woodhouse
Date:  
To: Alun
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Heads up?
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 08:44 +0000, Alun wrote:
> So where is my freedom to not associate with you if a spam run
> causes 495 challenge e-mails to my users?

That would be implicit in your freedom to implement SES or BATV. If you
don't ever send mail from the address which is being forged, you don't
need to accept bounces (or challenges) to that address either.

--
dwmw2



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [exim] Heads up?Re: [exim] perl support broken in exim v4.50_1 on FreeBSD v4.11->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)