Re: [Exim] Server Hostname compared to sending domain

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Matthew Byng-Maddick
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] Server Hostname compared to sending domain
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 11:18:09AM +0200, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
> well, after having seen that DNS report I would think before giving
> you a try... and it is "versatility"...


I'm just amused by its insistence that:
67.19.7.138 is not a public IP

(and .139)

(Because I'm lazy, I'll use routeviews.org, but:
:; host -t txt 138.7.19.67.asn.routeviews.org
138.7.19.67.asn.routeviews.org text "21844" "67.19.0.0" "17"

So 67.19.0.0/17 is advertised out of AS21844, in what way is that not
"public"?

MBM

--
Matthew Byng-Maddick          <mbm@???>           http://colondot.net/
                      (Please use this address to reply)