On Mon, 1 Dec 1997, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 1997, Alan Thew wrote:
>
> > It would be useful (but not critical) if it worked (or my error was
> > corrected - all the relay stuff here works with the %-hack off) for
> > locally delivered mail.
>
> What do you mean by "worked"? Do you want a new option saying "these are
> the domains that can be %-hacked to?" I am not at all sure what you gain
> by allowing xxxx%y.y.y@??? instead of just getting your users to
> use the proper address xxxx@??? in the first place. Maybe I am missing
> something?
>
No new options :-)
All I want is for
user%some-mach.liv.ac.uk@??? to work
and for
user%some-remote.site@??? to fail
My original settings allowed example 2 through.
Thanks
Alan Thew
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
