Re: Low priority transport...

On Fri, 26 Jul 1996, m.hampson wrote:

> You could then say things like, if a message has failed 10 times use a
> different MX record and send to a different host. Or if an on site MTA
> is down, queued message could be sent to a different MTA.

Idea noted. I'll try to think about this stuff over the next couple of
months.

--
Philip Hazel                   University Computing Service,
ph10@???             New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@???          England.  Phone: +44 1223 334714