Re: Low priority transport...

Página superior
Eliminar este mensaje
Responder a este mensaje
Autor: m.hampson
Fecha:  
A: exim-users
Asunto: Re: Low priority transport...
> Nigel Metheringham writes:
> >
> > Hence what I'd like to be able to do is add a backup or low priority

etc....
>
>
> I like this idea, but wondered about another approach. If you were to
> use the lookuphost driver to match each site, and exim were extended to
> allow specifying a seperate queue, both for delivery into and for queue
> running, this would do what you want, plus have some additional
> benefits. I know this wouldn't be quite as nice as your approach above
> for your specific case, as it wouldn't allow for the possibility of
> direct delivery if the site were connected at the time, but having
> seperate definable queues would be more flexible. Maybe the two could be
> combined.
>


What I would like is a clause in the config file that can use the
number of times a message has failed and then process the message
differently depending on this.

I guess this is tricky to do as most of the processing that determines
where a message is going is done once only.

However if a message could be completely re-processed this would be a major
win.

You could then say things like, if a message has failed 10 times use a
different MX record and send to a different host. Or if an on site MTA
is down, queued message could be sent to a different MTA.

Martyn






-- 
   +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
   | Martyn Hampson          |    Tel:    0171 594 6973                 |
   | Imperial College        |    Fax:    0171 594 6958                 |
   | Computer Centre         |    E-Mail: M.Hampson@???            |
   | London SW7 2BP, ENGLAND |    "Don't just do something, sit there!" |
   +--------------------------------------------------------------------+