Re: [exim] Gmail's new 'suspicious sender' flag

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jan Ingvoldstad
Date:  
To: Mike Cardwell
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Gmail's new 'suspicious sender' flag
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:27, Mike Cardwell
<exim-users@???>wrote:

>
> SPF causes mail delivery problems in some scenarios. I don't think
> anyone would deny that. From my experience, in practice, your email is
> more likely to be rejected because of a false positive on a spam
> filtering system than it is to be rejected because of one of these SPF
> issues. I don't ever see anyone arguing against the use of spam
> filtering though.
>


The difference between spam filtering and SPF is that you can usually get
around spam filtering.

But to get around a faulty (IMO) SPF record, you can essentially just give
up.
--
Jan