Re: [exim] Question on DKIM

On Fri, June 4, 2010 22:38, W B Hacker wrote:
> Presuming this applies only to (the balance of) the current session and
> child
> process, why should it be a 'PANIC' situation anyway? Hard-coded PANIC,
> IMNSHO,
> should be reserved for events/absence of events that impair the ability of
> the
> MTA to function at all.

Here are words I don't often speak: I agree with Bill.

DKIM sig mismatches appearing in paniclog is silly.


Mart.