Renaud Allard wrote:
>
> I just installed it on 2 of my production servers running OpenBSD amd64.
>
> It verifies DKIM fine (well, at least it seems so)
> 2009-10-14 14:09:03 [8704] H=sendmail.net [209.246.26.21]:63769
> I=[206.251.244.95]:25 Warning: CSA status: unknown
> 2009-10-14 14:09:04 [8704] 1My2f9-0002GO-W3 DKIM: d=sendmail.net
> s=gatsby c=relaxed/simple a=rsa-sha256 t=1255522141 [verification succeeded]
>
>
> It sends correct DKIM (although, now I get an error with DK because they
> are not present anymore)
> Authentication System: DomainKeys Identified Mail
> Result: DKIM signature confirmed GOOD
> Description: Signature verified, message arrived intact
> Reporting host: sendmail.net
> More information: http://mipassoc.org/dkim/
> Sendmail milter: https://sourceforge.net/projects/dkim-milter/
>
> Authentication System: Domain Keys
> Result: DK signature confirmed BAD
> Description: Signature verification failed, message may
> have been tampered with or corrupted
> Reporting host: sendmail.net
> More information: http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
> Sendmail milter:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/domainkeys-milter/
In the light of this, is there a way to specify that DKIM is mandatory
while DK will not be present?
