Re: [exim] Out of Office and collateral spam

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Ian Eiloart
Date:  
To: Patrick von der Hagen, ROGERS Richard
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Out of Office and collateral spam


--On 19 December 2007 14:04:43 +0100 Patrick von der Hagen
<hagen@???> wrote:

>
> Anyway, if your gateway can detect spam it can mark each message in a way
> that prevents Exchnge from sending OoO. Here we use exim to mark each
> message with a spam-value which is used to route messages in an
> Exchange-Junk-folder and make sure there is a Precedence-Header to avoid
> OoO.
>


Even better, if it's suspected spam, reject it. If you get a false
positive, the sender should get to know about it. Delivering real spam into
mailboxes is pointless, and delivering false positives into spam mailboxes
just ensures that they'll get lost - you might just as well thrown them
away.

Still, you might also look at Exim's "personal" filter condition, and
emulate that by adding headers before delivery. So, for example, if the
recipient isn't a "To:" recipient, then add the header.

--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
x3148