Mike Cardwell wrote:
>
> "Many people on the Exim mailing lists refuse to answer questions posted
> with obfuscated logs or configuration files. If you post obfuscated
> details on the mailing list, you may receive a reply directing you to
> this page. If you repost your question with unobfuscated logs and
> configuration files, you are a lot more likely to get a helpful answer
> from the members of the Exim mailing lists."
>
> That's misleading. It should say:
>
> "_A minority_ of people on the Exim mailing lists refuse to answer
> questions posted with obfuscated logs or configuration files. If
> you post obfuscated details on the mailing list, you may receive
> a reply directing you to this page. If you repost your question
> with unobfuscated logs and configuration files, you are _very
> slightly_ more likely to get a helpful answer from the members
> of the Exim mailing lists."
I recommend that we put this to a simple vote, with a ban on commentary
along with votes, to avoid the heated tempers that often arise when this
subject comes up.
My vote: keep it the way it is (obviously -- I wrote that paragraph).
- Marc
