Re: [exim] SORBS

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Hill Ruyter
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] SORBS
Hi

I heartily agree
and I am taking on board all advice regarding static addresses / smart hosts
etc.
I was more annoyed at the analogy with airports etc. and I wanted to counter
it as not being a valid
basis for justifying what people out there are doing

sorry for putting this view on the list as I guess you are right it is
rather off topic

Thanks again for all those who have advised me without condescending to me

Kind Regards
Hill


----- Original Message -----
From: "Marc Sherman" <msherman@???>
To: <exim-users@???>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: [exim] SORBS


> Hill Ruyter wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I understand all your points and they are all very valid
>> however should it be the case that someone be completely blocked purely
>> on
>> the basis of a dynamic IP ?
>
> Why are you arguing with us? We're not saying that blocking you is
> right, or moral, or even wise. We're simply saying that it's going to
> happen. That's not opinion, it's a fact of the internet today. We didn't
> decided to do it to you, we're just warning you that it's the truth.
>
> Sadly, you're not the first person to try to argue this here, and the
> last person who tried it didn't manage to change the internet by
> fighting with the users list of a single MTA; you're not going to, either.
>
> - Marc
>
>
> --
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
>