Author: Robert Millan Date: To: Tony Finch CC: exim-dev Subject: Re: [exim-dev] RFC: implementing 551-redirection (client side)
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 03:35:46PM +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > - We're a forwarder, smtp'ing to the next hop after we parsed ~/.forward.
> > - We're a sender, smtp'ing to the next hop after we got a 551.
> >
> > Can we handle #2 the same way #1 is?
>
> No, because #1 is a routing operation which happens entirely before the
> transport phase.
Can we get back to the router from the transport by issuing sendmail(1) as if we
were a MUA?
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is honeypot@???. Note: this address is only intended for
spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.
