Re: [exim-dev] Exim 4.61-RC1 available

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Andreas Metzler
Date:  
To: exim-dev
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] Exim 4.61-RC1 available
On 2006-03-27 Philip Hazel <ph10@???> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> How does


>> warn somecondition
>>      add_header X-added: foo


>> work if the incoming mail already contained a X-added: header. Do I
>> end up with two X-added: headers or is the old externally added
>> header replaced with the new one?


> You end up with two headers, just as you would do if you used the old
> mechanism via the "message" modifier.


Thanks for the clarification.

> There is no mechanism for deleting header lines in ACLs. To do what
> you are implying, I would use

[system filter]

Yes, that is what I am doing right now. I am not sure whether adding a
replace_header modifier would be
a elegant
or 
b cruft, as it can easily be done by other means (system filter). ;-)
          cu andreas
-- 
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute
tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects,
howsoever undertaken.                                (c) Jasper Ffforde