Re: [exim] RFC on accepting mail to return path addresses

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M\the complete thread tree sorted by date
MM\Sander Smeenk at <-
MMMSander Smeenk at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Ian Eiloart
Date:  
To: Sander Smeenk, exim-users
CC: 
Subject: Re: [exim] RFC on accepting mail to return path addresses


--On 22 March 2006 11:00:08 +0100 Sander Smeenk <ssmeenk@???>
wrote:

>
> And my message is never delivered to the mailinglist.
>
> What is the opinion of the masses, am I right to reject mail to return
> paths if they don't come from <> or postmaster?
>
> I'm happy to hear from you guys. Either on- or offlist ;)
>
> Kind regards,
> Sander Smeenk.

I don't think you should.

If you do want to, you could set a variable, then test for it in the
PREDATA ACL. If you reject at that point, it won't affect a callout.


--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-[exim] load goes highRe: [exim] RFC on accepting mail to return path addresses->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)