Eddie Shipman wrote:
> I don't mean unix accounts, I mean MAIL Accounts.
>
> --- Tony Finch <dot@???> wrote:
>
>
>>On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Eddie Shipman wrote:
>>
>>>Will this technique affect the forwarders, too, since they don't
>>>actually have an account?
>>
>>No: Exim's idea of the validity of email addresses is defined by the
>>routers, and is independent of Unix accounts on the machine.
>
'Router' as in exim configure file, not as in Cisco, etc.
Account validity can be checked by making a query (not an actual delivery)
to the 'routers' defined in exim's configure, and is ordinarily true/valid
if *at least one* router would accept the traffic for its associated
transport.
In that sense the forwarder DOES 'have an account' at least insofar as
being associated with a valid identity you will accept traffic for,
never mind that you may not keep or store said traffic.
Default configure aside, routers may or may not exist / be configured to
include system (Unix or other) shell acounts, system aliases, 'virtual',
or any other class of accounts.
IOW, someone would have to look at the code to be certain.
