RE: [exim] SPF and sequential exims.

>Obviously so.

So, is it as easy as to add a host = ! statler in the ACL in question?

>Leaving aside the wisdom of rejecting based on SPF, yes.

Yes, I know. But a customer wants it. One of the few who actually pays me
for the access.

>BTW, I hope statler is applying the same (or more) rejection criteria
>to incoming mail as scooter.

Yes, it has even more checks then scooter.