RE: [exim] SPF and sequential exims.

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
Mj2 at <-
Mj2 at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: David Woodhouse
Date:  
To: Jan Johansson
CC: exim-users
Subject: RE: [exim] SPF and sequential exims.
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 01:38 +0200, Jan Johansson wrote:
> >Leaving aside the wisdom of rejecting based on SPF, yes.
>
> Yes, I know. But a customer wants it. One of the few who actually pays
> me for the access.

Do they not also pay you for your expertise? Is it not your
responsibility to explain to them why certain options would be unwise?

--
dwmw2




This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-RE: [exim] Trying to use expanded address list in retriesRE: [exim] Trying to use expanded address list in retries->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)