Author: Jeremiah Foster Date: To: exim-users Subject: [exim] This should be simple but ...
> > On Sep 1, 2005, at 10:26 AM, Philip Hazel wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Marc Perkel wrote:
>>
>>> Exim docs are some of the best out there. But for some reason I
>>> still find
>>> things hard to find.
>>
>> If there are index entries that you look for and don't find, tell me,
>> and I'll try to put them in the next edition. You *did* look at the
>> index this time, I presume? After the index (and table of contents),
>> grep is your friend.
>>
>>> BTW - how are these docs generated?
>>
>> The current edition of everything except spec.txt is generated by an
>> arcane local process. The next edition will be generated by the
>> sequence
>>
>> AsciiDoc source -> DocBook XML -> various output processors
>>
>> The current spec.txt is a version already generated by the new
>> process.
>> I am unhappy about the typesetting of the PostScript/PDF versions in
>> the
>> new scheme of things (and the HTML isn't ideal either) but hope that
>> better free processors will come along in due course. At least the
>> input
>> will be in a relatively standard format.
> > Personally, I find the spec easier to read than the HTML. The colors
> are off-putting and there is a lack of white space to make for easy
> reading. Might a new CSS file fix this easily?
> > Jeremiah
