On Tue, 17 May 2005, Justin Frydman wrote:
> hrmm so i don't have a local_sa_delivery etc to add temp_errors too.
> where should it go?
Perhaps you should try reading the log message, which helpfully indicates
the transport that failed:
2005-05-17 08:57:39 1DY2Ux-0006er-Cw <jay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: spamcheck transport output: An error was detected while processing a file of BSMTP input.
> is this patch included in exim 4.51? if not then this bug is not fixed.
Perhaps you should try reading the ChangeLog, which helpfully lists which
patches have been included in version 4.51.
PH/45 In a pipe transport, although a timeout while waiting for the pipe
process to complete was treated as a delivery failure, a timeout while
writing the message to the pipe was logged, but erroneously treated as a
successful delivery. Such timeouts include transport filter timeouts. For
consistency with the overall process timeout, these timeouts are now
treated as errors, giving rise to delivery failures by default. However,
there is now a new Boolean option for the pipe transport called
timeout_defer, which, if set TRUE, converts the failures into defers for
both kinds of timeout. A transport filter timeout is now identified in
the log output.
Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???>
http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
