Re: [Exim] Different arguments in favor of Webmin

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Mitsu Hadeishi
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] Different arguments in favor of Webmin
Yeah, I prefer writing in PHP than Perl (Webmin modules have to be written in
Perl.) Perhaps a standalone PHP control panel for Exim would be easier to
write. If there are others interested in working on this, maybe we could get
together to build something. Someone with a thorough knowledge of all the
different configuration options in Exim would be needed on the project, and
that's not me, but I would be willing to write some of the code.

Mitsu

On Monday 26 January 2004 01:31 pm, Rossz Vamos-Wentworth wrote:
> A few years ago I worked for Sendmail, Inc. The company's primary
> product is an excellent GUI for configuring and managing sendmail. I
> knew absolutely nothing about configuring sendmail. Yet with this GUI,
> I was able to deploy my first mail server that was efficient, safe, and
> secure. About a year after I was laid off from my job (along with 40%
> of their employees) I switched to Exim. I would have stayed with
> sendmail if I still had access to their wonderful GUI, but the version I
> had was getting old.
>
> Exim is a thousand times easier to configure than the "raw" version of
> sendmail, but it could still benefit from a GUI. I haven't tackled this
> because there are important features I have not yet used. For example,
> other than configuring a smarthost, I have not dealt with setting up
> relays of any sort.
>
> I have fooled around with Webmin a few times, but don't particularly
> like it. Personally, I would prefer something that was independent of
> Webmin. A web interface written in PHP or Perl would work very well.
> For security, using an SSL connection is urged.
>
> BTW, Sendmail, Inc was the last permanent job I held. I could sure use a
> job.
>
> --
> Rossz
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim
> details at http://www.exim.org/ ##