Re: [Exim] wacky idea with exiscan and SpamAssassin

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M--+\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M-\MMChris Edwards at <-
M\MMPhilip Hazel at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Matt Bernstein
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] wacky idea with exiscan and SpamAssassin
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Matt Bernstein wrote:

> I don't think the Exim spec (37.11; 6.11) states whether "delay =" values
> are expanded or not. If they're not then of course the above is illegal.

It states somewhere that *all* ACL condition/modifier arguments are
expanded. 

--
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book:    http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Exim] wacky idea with exiscan and SpamAssassinRe: [Exim] wacky idea with exiscan and SpamAssassin->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)