Author: Thomas Tonino Date: To: exim-users CC: Thomas Tonino, marc Subject: Re: [Exim] TARPIT ACL - for Spam Control
Philip Hazel wrote:
> Use of "delay" shouldn't affect the use of "message". If you can send a
> real example that I can reproduce, I will investigate (but not
> immediately).
I'm sorry, I made a mistake in my post: what I meant to say was that "message"
doesn't seem to produce anything when used in an "accept" (in combination with a
delay, but that should not matter). In any case it does not message back to the
SMTP session.
I'd like to use this to warn a sender why they see a slow response: they are on
a DUL list.
