On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 09:14:11 +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
> > 2) Exim queue runners' memory requirements are directly proportional to
> > the size of the largest spool directory.
>
> Yes, that's true. I'd forgotten to point that out.
Cool. With under a million messages on the queue, this isn't going to
present me with any problems.
When I reach the point at which it makes sense for me to invest some
time in split_spool_directory_even_more functionality, will it be a lot
of work?
By the way, why is it that one sees better throughput from launching a
large number of queue runners than one does by running 1 queue runner
that is allowed to launch a large number of delivery processes?
Ciao,
Sheldon.
