Re: [Exim] port number logging in received lines

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Jeffrey Goldberg
CC: Philip Blundell, exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] port number logging in received lines
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:

> On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Philip Hazel wrote:
>
> > I *thought* I was following an established standard, but obviously I was
> > deluded. How about 1.2.3.4-25 and 3ffe::1:2:3-25 as an alternative?
>
> Or use "p" instead of "-" perhaps.


I almost suggested that myself, but when I looked at it, I didn't
actually like it. I think the '-' stands out more clearly, but YMMV and if
lots of people prefer 'p' I don't feel that strongly.

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.