Re: [Exim] port number logging in received lines

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M-\the complete thread tree sorted by date
M\MPhilip Hazel at <-
MMPhilip Blundell at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jeffrey Goldberg
Date:  
To: Philip Hazel
CC: Philip Blundell, exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] port number logging in received lines
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Philip Hazel wrote:

> I *thought* I was following an established standard, but obviously I was
> deluded. How about 1.2.3.4-25 and 3ffe::1:2:3-25 as an alternative?

Or use "p" instead of "-" perhaps.

-j

--
Jeffrey Goldberg
I have recently moved, see http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/contact.html
Relativism is the triumph of authority over truth, convention over justice



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Exim] rejecting mail[Exim] local delivery via smtp->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)