Re: [Exim] port number logging in received lines

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
M-\Jeffrey Goldberg at <-
M\MPhilip Hazel at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Blundell
Date:  
To: Philip Hazel
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] port number logging in received lines
>> IPv6 address literals are just a disaster anyway.
>
>Very true. What made them chose colon?

Dunno. Precedent set by Ethernet addresses, maybe.

>I *thought* I was following an established standard, but obviously I was
>deluded. How about 1.2.3.4-25 and 3ffe::1:2:3-25 as an alternative?

Sure, that looks OK to me.

p.




This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-[Exim] local delivery via smtpRe: [Exim] port number logging in received lines->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)