Re: [Exim] receiver_verify and require_files problem

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] receiver_verify and require_files problem
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Peter Radcliffe wrote:

> This would seem to require the opposite effect to + in require_files,
> like so:
>
> procmail_verify:
> driver = localuser
> suffix = DSUFFIX*
> suffix_optional
> require_files = "${local_part}:-${home}/.procmailrc"
> verify_only
>
> Where - acts like + but assumes the file exists if it gets EACCS instead
> of assuming it doesn't exist ...
>
> Ah, Philip, any chance of a code addition ? :)


I'm afraid this doesn't feel right to me. It seems a backwards way of
going about things, though I can't really say why I feel this. I'll put
the idea on the Wish List and think about it.

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.