Re: [Exim] Performance bottleneck scanning large spools.

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Chris Knipe
Date:  
To: Nigel Metheringham
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] Performance bottleneck scanning large spools.
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Nigel Metheringham wrote:

>You are starting to believe Sun's marketing material. The Sun
>filesystem (straight system V UFS) is pretty lousy. You may improve
>things significantly by moving to VxFS or similar (at a cost of say 3K
>pounds per processor), but it really needs the application end to be
>designed for that sort of scaling.


From my own experiance, and from what I've seen and heard, especially as
far as their hardware goes... I would have to say yes...

>My own prefered solution for huge mail systems (ISP class - Enterprise
>might have rather different characteristics), is to split the functions
>down:-


Another way which I actually thought about that might also be good to take
load of mail servers...


IN MX 10 mail.somedomain.com

mail   A  x.x.x.x
       A  x.x.x.x
       A  x.x.x.x


etc etc etc ? This is allowed in DNS, that I am sure about, but will it be
accepted as far as MX records go?

Regards
Chris Knipe
Cel: (083) 430 8151
Freelance Internet Developer, Consultant, Administrator & Speaker