On Mon, 21 Sep 1998, Peter Radcliffe wrote:
> > Sorry, I don't quite follow what the characteristics of :unknown: are
> > meant to be. How does it differ from :fail: ?
>
> I would like it to produce exactly the same output as if the address had
> never existed. :fail: produces different output.
I think I get you. You want it to pass the address on to the next
director (which is what would happen without the * in the search),
whereas :fail: forces a delivery failure. If there is no
next director or if no_more is set, you get a "true bounce".
OK. Added to the Wish List, on which I may start work fairly soon.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
