On 7 Jul 1998, Harald Meland wrote:
> But, there is not much support for syslog(3) in Exim 1.92. Is there
> some reason for this?
Only that I didn't consider it.
> IMHO, logging directly to local disk should be a feature orthogonal to
> logging through syslog. I can see logging to local disk being a
> reasonable default for most systems using Exim today, but I , for one,
> would really like to have "proper" syslog logging.
I will add this item to the New Wish List, which I am planning on
publishing for comment once 2.00 is released and settled down.
--
Philip Hazel University Computing Service,
P.Hazel@??? New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
ph10@??? (sic) England. Phone: +44 1223 334714
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
