On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> Fair enough. What about a configurable response delay, then, such that the
> full message displays together, but maybe X seconds after the request is
> determined to be rejected (X being a number that is as long as possible
> without causing a timeout).
That is fairly trivial to implement. But I think I need a number of
people positively supporting this before doing it.
On Wed, 19 Nov 1997, Piete Brooks wrote:
> I was assuming that exim would discard all privs, release all "locks",
> and then exec a *TINY* programme which t a l k e d v e r y s l o w l y
> and knows just enough to reply "550" to all lines of input.
That is of course more work to implement.
--
Philip Hazel University Computing Service,
ph10@??? New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@??? England. Phone: +44 1223 334714
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
