On Tue, 21 Oct 1997, John Horne wrote:
> I think I'm still stuck with this. I reverted back to using an autoreply
> transport (from a smartuser director) with a transport filter, but am
> positive that the transport filter doesn't get run. It only contains a print
> statement so my Perl can't be that bad. Unfortunately I need to use the
> autoreply in order to retain the original local part, hence I can't use an
> smtp transport with the filter (although this works otherwise).
>
> If my understanding of the last statement of the manual section on generic
> transport options (Exim manual 1.71) is correct then this can't be done since
> the autoreply transport doesn't actually transport (deliver) the message it
> self but generates a new message and the transport filter is used on the
> original (which gets discarded anyway) - hence it appears not to work. Am I
> right or wrong?
You are right. An autoreply creates an entirely new message - a "reply" -
rather than re-directing the incoming one.
--
Philip Hazel University Computing Service,
ph10@??? New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@??? England. Phone: +44 1223 334714
--
* This is sent by the exim-users mailing list. To unsubscribe send a
mail with subject "unsubscribe" to exim-users-request@???
* Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/
