On Mon, 2 Sep 1996, Nick Waterman wrote:
> Yup. I hated this too, but couldn't decide whether it countd as a bug or
> not, so I just "fixed" it for myself and decided to keep quiet about it
> unless anyone else complained. Our ELM didn't complain about a corrupt
> mailbox, but it DID think the message was a continuation of the message
> beforehand - eurgh!
Our elm (ELM 2.4 PL24) does not seem to suffer from this problem, and
nor does Pine. Are you running an older (or newer!) version of Elm?
--
Philip Hazel University Computing Service,
ph10@??? New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@??? England. Phone: +44 1223 334714
