https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3118
--- Comment #6 from Maxim Galaganov <max@???> ---
(In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #5)
> OK. This demands a bit of shuffling in the implementation, but feels
> feasible. A forced-fail won't be required, just a zero-length result
> for the expansion.
>
Yes, zero-length result is fine here, if this doesn't mess too much with
existing expectations.
> A wider-coverage alternative would be a fallback-transport, but that would
> be far more invasive.
>
Indeed.
> On running using modified code in Exim - I trust you realize that this
> destroys any assumptions about how Exim operates, and thereby makes
> support a random affair and possibly a total time-waster.
We are way past the point of requesting any support for this upstream. :)
Occasionally though I stumple upon something that may affect or be mildly
useful for others, hence the wishlist ticket.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-dev.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## exim-dev-unsubscribe@???
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://wiki.exim.org/
