https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3118
Jeremy Harris <jgh146exb@???> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Priority|medium |low
Component|General execution |Transports
Assignee|unallocated@??? |jgh146exb@???
Target Milestone|Exim 4.98 |Exim 4.99
--- Comment #5 from Jeremy Harris <jgh146exb@???> ---
OK. This demands a bit of shuffling in the implementation, but feels
feasible. A forced-fail won't be required, just a zero-length result
for the expansion.
A wider-coverage alternative would be a fallback-transport, but that would
be far more invasive.
On running using modified code in Exim - I trust you realize that this
destroys any assumptions about how Exim operates, and thereby makes
support a random affair and possibly a total time-waster.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-dev.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## exim-dev-unsubscribe@???
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://wiki.exim.org/
