Kai Bojens via Exim-users <exim-users@???> (Mi 17 Jul 2024 08:43:00 CEST):
> Am 15.07.24 um 19:43 schrieb Jeremy Harris via Exim-users:
>
> > Sounds like they changed what their output looks like.
> > DO tell us if you get a response from the rspamd guys,
> > and feel free to open an issue on bugs.exim.org
> > (since they are unlikely to retreat).
>
> The rspamd developer answered:
>
> "Exim support of Rspamd is just broken I would say. Nobody actually takes
> care about legacy SA protocol support and nobody should (as we have
…
I remember that we had trouble with rspamd already before, as it used to
have an uncommon understanding of how (half open/closed) connections
should be handled. (In case I remember correctly). So my personal
feeling is, that rspamd understands itself as the single source of truth
about networking (among other things.)
But I still think, we should try supporting it. (Or even better, find a
way to use the milter protocol to interface with other externals too.)
Best regards from Dresden/Germany
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann, Dipl.-Ing. (TU) - {fon,fax}: +49.351.802998{1,3} -
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome --------------- key ID: F69376CE -
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## exim-users-unsubscribe@???
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://wiki.exim.org/
