Dňa 26. mája 2023 22:04:42 UTC používateľ Victor Ustugov via Exim-users <exim-users@???> napísal:
>Or was your question about MTA features for your personal use only?
No, that was rhetorical questions ;-)
>It would be nice if everyone used your MUA or my MUA. But that doesn't
>happen in real life. I would consider the worst case scenarios as well.
The MUAs are not as important, as they are as people -- can
do strange things ;-)
More important is, that this header passes the header_syntax
and header_sender verify, thus one can expect that all exim's
expansions can do its job with it and will provide reliable output.
But as you clearly show, that it is not case of ${address:...}.
As From: header can contain multiple addresses (by definition),
it can be more appropriate to use ${addresses:...} and it works,
as Jeremy shown. But in this case it contains only one address
string (while not RFC compliant).
In any case, the exim's behavior is inconsisten, if it is
considered as broken it have to be broken in all cases
not only in some. Any devs opinion/decision?
regard
--
Slavko
https://www.slavino.sk/
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## exim-users-unsubscribe@???
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://wiki.exim.org/
