Re: [exim] Re (2): Syntactic validity of configuration.

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Odhiambo Washington
Date:  
To: Odhiambo Washington via Exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Re (2): Syntactic validity of configuration.
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 9:59 AM Slavko via Exim-users <exim-users@???>
wrote:

> Dňa 10. apríla 2023 22:57:49 UTC používateľ Odhiambo Washington via
> Exim-users <exim-users@???> napísal:
>
> >For me I am okay. I always blow away the Debian split config for my own
> >monolithic one.
>
> I do it opposite and i use that split style in many other daemons,
> including eg. sshd, dovecot, nginx, uwsgi, systemd, even with
> sudo...
>
> I found it as more easy to manage (and versioning, eg. git). If split
> is done logically i consider it as more easy to work with small files
> and to implement automation (eg. ansible).
>
> The only downside with exim is, that this split (as implemented
> in debian) is not directly supported by exim, and one have to
> reload exim even to test it, but on other side, at least i do not
> forget to reload it after changes ;-)
>


I recently tried wading through Exim on Debian to find where to configure
the TLS certificates until I got annoyed.
I wouldn't wish Debian-exim on anyone :-)

--
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223
"Oh, the cruft.", egrep -v '^$|^.*#' ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ :-)
[How to ask smart questions:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]