Re: [exim-dev] [Bug 2159] using -f "" AND multiple .forward …

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Viktor Dukhovni
Date:  
To: exim-dev
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] [Bug 2159] using -f "" AND multiple .forward files causes frozen mail

> On Aug 24, 2017, at 11:49 AM, admin@??? wrote:
>
> https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2159
>
> --- Comment #3 from Graeme Vetterlein <graeme.exim4@???> ---
> Andreas,
>
> Yes I believe so. My ISPs relay is rejecting the message in this specific
> situation. If only one user forwards it accepts it . With two (or more?) it
> rejects it in this fashion. I would have expected the two .forwards to operate
> independently .


Mail from the empty sender address is typically expected to be a bounce, and
so directed at just one mailbox. Lists that expand to multiple users should
not in general be the envelope senders of email, so bounces are broadly
expected to not expand to multiple users en-route. Therefore, some receiving
systems enforce single-recipient bounce messages.

FWIW, Postfix even has a feature to implement precisely such a policy:

http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#reject_multi_recipient_bounce

      Reject  the  request  when the envelope sender is the null address,
      and the message has multiple envelope recipients.  This  usage  has
      rare   but   legitimate  applications:  under  certain  conditions,
      multi-recipient  mail  that  was  posted  with   the   DSN   option
      NOTIFY=NEVER may be forwarded with the null sender address.


and I expect that though not extremely popular, this is used at a
non-negligible number of sites.

-- 
    Viktor.