Rob Gunther via Exim-users <exim-users@???> (Fr 11 Aug 2017 04:20:59 CEST): > I have a router that I use for catch-all purposes. If the conditions are
> all valid, it adds a header and redirects the message to the catch-all
> account defined for the domain.
>
> headers_add = "X-Catch-All: user@???"
>
> That works fine, has been working for years.
>
> Further down in my router list I am trying to add a new router, that I do
> *not* want to run if the message has the X-Catch-All header.
If the first router already fired (routed the address), why should a 2nd router fire?
