https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1679
--- Comment #17 from henrik.hank@??? ---
Can you tell me whether you view this as nonsense:
> (?x)
> (?:
> # Find:
> a
> (?<whitespaces>\s+)
> b
> )
> (*MARK:
> # Replace with:
> 1
> \g{whitespaces}
> 2
> )
Of course, there's no second match of the same text in question. So it might
have to be viewed as an inconsistent syntax. On the other hand, I've found this
description for "\g{name}":
> Substituted with the text matched by the named group "name".
If this is the official point of view, it might be okay.
Could it even be implemented?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
