On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Todd Lyons <tlyons@???> wrote:
>>> I would like to consider a different, more specific, name for it,
>>> based on what it is actually checking, maybe something like:
>>> header_names_ascii (I'm partial to this one)
>> No, I think header_names_ascii is best.
> Ok, I will rework the patch and change the name.
I have put the proposed patch up for review at:
http://git.exim.org/users/tlyons/exim.git/shortlog/refs/heads/master_8bitchars
Any comments good or bad, please let me know. I'd be most interested
in feedback on the documentation blurbs than anything else.
...Todd
--
The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0.
If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want,
send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine
