Re: [exim] Exim4 vs Gmail - DKIM algorithms incompatibility

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Marcin Mirosław
Date:  
To: exim-users
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Exim4 vs Gmail - DKIM algorithms incompatibility
W dniu 2013-11-04 19:33, Phil Pennock pisze:
> On 2013-11-04 at 12:19 +0100, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
>> I,m (I was) using exim 4.80.1 and I started to use DMARC. I received
>> report from google, in xml I found:
>>     <auth_results>
>>       <dkim>
>>         <domain>mejor.pl</domain>
>>         <result>fail</result>
>>       </dkim>

>
>> --
>> ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
>> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
>> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
>
> Those bits there ^^^ are mailing-list footers, added to your mail by
> Mailman. They are common on public mailing-lists. They also break DKIM
> signatures.
>
> So the act of posting your mail to exim-users will bump the count of
> auth_results which fail. You include only part of the XML schema; that
> <auth_results/> should belong to a <record/> which also includes a
> <row>/ containing a <source_ip/>.
>
> What you're actually able to get is set of counts of how many
> subscribers to each mailing-list you're on use Google services to handle
> the mail which they receive from those mailing-lists.


Again I've attached too little. You can find complete xml report
attached to email.
This one email wasn't sent to maling list, it was sent to gmail user.
Regards,
Marcin
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<feedback>
  <report_metadata>
    <org_name>google.com</org_name>
    <email>noreply-dmarc-support@???</email>
    <extra_contact_info>http://support.google.com/a/bin/answer.py?answer=2466580</extra_contact_info>
    <report_id>8813207516108810573</report_id>
    <date_range>
      <begin>1383091200</begin>
      <end>1383177599</end>
    </date_range>
  </report_metadata>
  <policy_published>
    <domain>mejor.pl</domain>
    <adkim>r</adkim>
    <aspf>r</aspf>
    <p>none</p>
    <sp>none</sp>
    <pct>100</pct>
  </policy_published>
  <record>
    <row>
      <source_ip>2001:470:1f15:1b61::2</source_ip>
      <count>1</count>
      <policy_evaluated>
        <disposition>none</disposition>
        <dkim>fail</dkim>
        <spf>pass</spf>
      </policy_evaluated>
    </row>
    <identifiers>
      <header_from>mejor.pl</header_from>
    </identifiers>
    <auth_results>
      <dkim>
        <domain>mejor.pl</domain>
        <result>fail</result>
      </dkim>
      <spf>
        <domain>mejor.pl</domain>
        <result>pass</result>
      </spf>
    </auth_results>
  </record>
</feedback>