------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1348
--- Comment #3 from Miklos Tirpak <miklos@???> 2013-04-18 09:44:19 ---
Thank you very much for the quick help!
Yes, I can use possessive quantifiers, and they speed up the match a
lot, or better to say, the non-match.
I will also lower the match and recursion limits to protect the system
because I do not know in advance what kind of expressions the user will
define.
Thanks,
Miklos
On 04/17/2013 09:29 PM, Zoltan Herczeg wrote:
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug.
>
> http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1348
>
> Zoltan Herczeg <hzmester@???> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |hzmester@???
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from Zoltan Herczeg <hzmester@???> 2013-04-17 20:29:43 ---
> Can't you use possessive quantifiers here?
>
> [0-9a-fA-F#\*] intersect [\-\.\(\)] seems empty.
>
> ([0-9a-fA-F#\*]+[\-\.\(\)]?)* is the same as ([0-9a-fA-F#\*]++[\-\.\(\)])*
>
>
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.exim.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
